In every case, someone makes a choice that gives rise to the claim. For the attorney conducting a cross-examination of the person or persons who made the choice, dissecting the thought process that led to that choice will provide fodder for cross-examination and lead to success in the courtroom.
In their Trial Advocacy column published Today in the New York Law Journal, New York trial lawyers Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan explore Question and Answer techniques for eliciting useful responses.
Read more in the New York Law Journal
